Deeper Shades of Mossad - Urban Moving Systems & the Exploding Mural Van

Why would "movers" (become amateur photo-journalists) see an horrific plane crash to be an event worthy of celebration? Why would these Jews be grinning, high fiving, all while posing to be photographed with the Twin Towers burning in the background? And why did they take at least one photo with Sivan Kurzberg holding a "lighted lighter" up in a pose with the Towers aflame behind him?

From the FBI report:

The Israelis were observed near Liberty State Park New Jersey celebrating and photographing the World Trade Center (WTC) explosion within minutes after the WTC (Ie: The First Tower; the North Tower) was first hit by an aircraft.

It should be noted that there were inconsistencies in the statements made by (Blanked out = Yaron Shmuel) who stated that the van he was in was on the West Side Highway in New York at the time of the attack on the WTC.

However, he is clearly visible in photographs which he and other occupants in the van had taken from a roof top parking garage located at 100 Manhattan Avenue, Jersey City, New Jersey, within minutes after the first WTC building was struck by an aircraft.

[So Yaron Shmuel and Sivan Kurzberg - who, as reported by The New York Times, was shown in one photograph "holding a lighted lighter" - both appear in the photos of the happy, celebrating Israelis.]

The 9/11 'Dancing Israelis' - Arresting officer speaks

SEPTEMBER 23, 2011

"We were all on edge obviously, so I really wasn't looking to make friends with these people - and neither were the officers that I was with..." (Quote from the 2005 film 'Protocols of Zion')

By Dave Gahary (AFP)

The New Jersey police officer responsible for capturing five Israelis who filmed and celebrated while the World Trade Center towers burned has broken his silence, agreeing to a Sept. 16 exclusive interview with AMERICAN FREE PRESS.

As AFP readers are no doubt aware, these are the same Israelis who were working under the direction of Urban Moving Systems, a Mossad front company at the center of Israeli involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks.

Sgt. Scott DeCarlo has never spoken to the media about the details of that day except for two 30-second cameo appearances in Internet videos from undetermined sources. In fact, DeCarlo confirmed that this is the first, and last, interview he will ever grant in regard to this subject.

The "Dancing Israelis" FBI Report - Unpacked

The Next Day

Reposted from Take Our World Back as a follow up to my recent post:

Freedom of Information Release – FBI Documents RE: ‘Urban MOving SystemSIncorporAteD‘ & the 9/11 ‘Dancing Israelis’

Introduction

Thanks to andie531 for obtaining and making available the FBI documents on the "Dancing Israelis": KURZBERG, SIVAN ET AL. As will be shown, this FBI 'investigation' is very similar to the NIST 'investigations' into the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings collapses, in that the conclusion is politically motivated rather than evidence-based. Section 5 even reveals how the FBI's NS-2C Unit of its "National Security Division" based at FBI Headquarters, Washington, D.C., ordered FBI Newark to stop their investigation of the Israelis.

The documents were partly declassified in 2005.

However, there are many parts that are still blanked out and classified until 2030 or 2035.

Apart from names of individuals, the unreleased material includes longer passages such as the section following the question: "1. Did the Israeli nationals have foreknowledge of the events at WTC and were they filming the events prior to and in anticipation of the explosion?" The fact that it's blanked out indicates that the answer is clearly not an emphatic "no".

Nonetheless, the material that has already been released is sufficient to prove that the Israelis did indeed have foreknowledge of the attacks on the WTC. That is of course consistent with Israel's capability and history of staging false-flag terror, the two hours' advance warning of the WTC attack transmitted via the Herzliya / New York-based Israeli instant messaging service Odigo, the failure of Benjamin Netanyahu's friend Larry Silverstein and his children to turn up for work that day at the World Trade Center, Netanyahu's advance warning of, and Efraim Halevy's intimate knowledge of, the London 7/7 attacks, the $250,000 "loan" received by Bernard Kerik from Israeli billionaire Eitan Wertheimer together with $236,000 in rent paid by Steven C. Witkoff after Kerik visited Israel from August 26-29, 2001 to meet with Wertheimer and then claimed on September 16, 2001 that a "hijacker's passport" had been "discovered", along with multiple corroborating evidence much too numerous to mention in an introduction. Not surprisingly, experts from such professions as structural engineers, architects, physicists, mechanical engineers, metallurgical engineering graduates, PhD scientists, fire protection engineers, fire-fighters, electrical design engineers, explosives technicians, etc, may be seen speaking out on the ae911truth channel on YouTube, explaining why they know the government's half-baked conspiracy theory about suicidal Arabs with box cutters crashing two planes and managing to bring down three high-rises is believable only by the uneducated and the uninformed.

Excerpts from the FBI official report are included here for easy reference.

Is Gordon Duff a Jewish Disinformation Agent?

A Jewish Agent? Mossad? Sayanim? Or Just Ignorant?

Gordon Duff (of the website Veterans Today) posted a video of himself on the Iranian Talmudvision news program Press TV where he speaks about 9/11... on THIS page.

In the video, he tries to convince the audience that it was in fact not a plane which crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11. It was rather, he tells us breathlessly, a cruise missile of some kind (or something).

He references a video (supposedly "leaked") which shows from above a small whitish object appearing to collide with the Pentagon. The explosion in this video doesn't even begin to resemble the massive fireball which resulted from the plane crash that day. It has other serious problems as well...

Yeah... That Looks Real... Look! The Jew that made this video on his computer even left his cursor right in the middle of the video! Ha

1. The 'object' comes in relevant to the Pentagon at the wrong angle.
2. The object comes from entirely the wrong direction.
3. The object hits the Pentagon in completely the wrong location.

Not to mention the fact that you can tell it's just CGI and poorly done CGI at that.

Here's the video though - if any of you want a laugh:

Where There's Smoke - There's Fire... ADL Says: 9/11 AntisemiticTheories 'Alive and Well'? Well that IS strange!

From YNET

(Text in green by The Prodigal Son)

Jewish group shows how conspiracy theories surrounding attacks have grown and evolved over past decade, including claim that Jews or
Israel
(the Jewish state) perpetrated attacks instead of al-Qaeda

Ten years after 9/11, antisemitic conspiracy theories surrounding the attacks are “alive and well” and fueled by an entrenched propaganda industry, according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which issued a new report Wednesday showing how these theories have grown and evolved over the last decade.

(Guess what Abe... Facts based on reality are not "theories"! Rather, the notion that 19 Arabs perpetrated the attacks of 9/11 is a proper theory; one for which there is no evidence.

In actuality the 'Arab hijackers' were Mossad agents PRETENDING to be Arabs, using forged passports and stolen identities as is their well-known modus operandi.)

In “Decade of Deceit: Antisemitic 9/11 Conspiracy Theories 10 Years Later” -  ADL looks at the individuals who continue to circulate distorted conspiracy theories about 9/11, including the claim that the Jews or
Israel
(the Jewish state) perpetrated the attacks instead of al-Qaeda.

A new chorus of voices – who claim not to be anti-Jewish but simply anti-Zionist – have become the most popular promoters of these ideas, the Jewish group says.

 ("Most popular"? Popular with who? I for one certainly have not become more popular!)

Freedom of Information Release - FBI Documents RE: 'Urban MOvingSystemS IncorporAteD' & the 9/11 'Dancing Israelis'

1138796-001 --- 303A-NK-105536 --- Section 1 (944861)

The Judeo-Russian Mafia... From the Gulag to Brooklyn to World Dominion

Russian Mafia

~~~ ~ † ~ ~~~

†IC  XC†

†NI  KA†

Holy Scripture and the Church

By New Hieromartyr Hilarion (Troitsky),

Archbishop of Verey

~~~ ~ † ~ ~~~

Editor’s Note: The following article was written in 1914, when St. Hilarion was an archimandrite and a professor of the Imperial Moscow Spiritual Academy. Its message is especially pertinent for our times, when there is widespread confusion and ignorance about the true nature of Christ’s Church and about the right approach to Holy Scripture. It can provide invaluable help to Orthodox Christians in understanding their Faith more deeply, and in defending and giving an account of it when confronted with heterodox—especially Protestant—claims. At the same time, it can serve as wake-up call to Protestants, who separate the Bible from the Church, as well as to those Orthodox Christian scholars who have been unduly influenced by the modern “higher criticism” of the Bible which originated within German Protestantism—the fallacies of which are profoundly demonstrated by our modern-day Orthodox apologist, St. Hilarion.

~~~ ~ † ~ ~~~

In the Church there are no stone tablets with letters inscribed by a Divine finger. The Church has the Holy Scriptures, but He Who established the Church wrote nothing. Only once, in the Gospel of John, was it said of Christ that He stooped down and wrote something; but even this one time Christ wrote with his finger and on the ground, it may even be that He did not write any words at all, but merely drew with His finger pointing to the ground. And yet the Church has Scripture, which is called by her Holy and Divine.

Christ did not write anything.

It seems that if one reflects enough on this fact, one can somewhat understand the very essence of the work of Christ. As a rule, other religious leaders of humanity, founders of various philosophical schools, have written readily and in abundance, and yet Christ wrote nothing at all. Does not this mean that in its essence the work of Christ has nothing in common with the work of any of the philosophers, teachers, or leading representatives of the intellectual life of mankind? Furthermore, has the Church herself ever viewed her Founder as one of the teachers of mankind? Has she ever considered His teachings as the essence of His work? No, with the utmost exertion of her theological strength, the Christian Church has defended as the greatest religious truth that Christ is the Only-begotten Son of God, One in essence with God the Father, Who became incarnate on earth. For that truth, the greatest Fathers of the Church labored to the point of blood.

They were unbending in the battle for this truth. They did not yield a single inch to their adversaries, literarily not even a single iota, which in the Greek language differentiates homoiousion, “of similar essence,” from homoousion, “co-essential.” “Those who call these men [i.e., Arians] Christians are in great and grievous error,” writes St. Athanasius the Great. Thus did this adamant of Orthodoxy argue definitively about the impossibility of being a Christian while denying the Incarnation of the Son of God, Who is co-essential with God the Father.

But was the Incarnation of the Only-begotten Son of God necessary only in order to write a book and entrust it to mankind? Was it absolutely essential for Him to be the Only-begotten Son of God just to write a book? If the Church insisted with such determination on the Divine dignity of her Founder, then obviously she did not regard writing to be the essence of His work. It was the Incarnation of the Son of God that was necessary for the salvation of mankind, and not a book.

Who Decides? Unraveling the Mystery of the Old Testament Canon

by Daniel Lieuwen

When the Church began, there were no New Testament books. Old Testament texts alone were used as Scripture. The Old Testament used in the early Church throughout the Roman world was not the Hebrew Old Testament, but a translation of the Old Testament into Greek called the Septuagint (LXX). The LXX was translated in Alexandria during the reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus in the middle of the third century B.C., and was the standard Old Testament in the synagogues throughout the Hellenistic world (including Palestine) at the time of Christ.

In addition to the books included in a Protestant Old Testament, the LXX contained a number of other books now commonly referred to as Apocrypha or Deuterocanonical. Some of these books are Tobit, Judith, Maccabees, and a longer version of Daniel.

The LXX is based on a very different text of the Old Testament from the Masoretic text, on which modern English translations are based. For instance, in many places the wording is quite different, and the content of the books also differs—generally the LXX text is longer, but there are also interesting additions to the Masoretic text that are not found in the LXX. The text on which the LXX is based is as ancient as the Masoretic text, as testified by the Dead Sea scrolls and many other ancient witnesses.

A 'Standardized' Judaic Text

Judaism was quite fluid (fragmented; lost) at the time of Christ. There were seven distinct sects of the Jews in the early first century, according to Eusebius. The different sects accepted the authority of different collections of books (e.g., the Sadducees and Samaritans accepted only the five books of the Prophet Moses, the Torah), and there were often significant differences in the composition of the books they accepted in common. Sometimes the same sect might even make use of multiple text bases, or as scholars call them, text traditions. For example, the Dead Sea scrolls, (likely) containing the sacred texts of the Essene sect of Judaism, show evidence of the Masoretic, Samaritan, and LXX text bases.

However, with the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70, an intense standardization process began. Only the Pharisaic and the Samaritan sects of Judaism survived this process. The collection of Old Testament books into what eventually became the Masoretic text was begun by the Pharisees at the Council of Jamnia, somewhere between AD 80 and 100