Outside Job: Seven Answers to Jim Fetzer’s Seven Stupid Questions – ‘No Planes’? No Brains!

Keep making jokes there Leibowitz. Laugh it up funny man...

I read all of the headlines at What Really Happened every day...

I know that the guy who runs the site is anti-Christian but he's just anti-religion altogether; he's an atheist. Since he seems otherwise to be a fairly smart fellow, I just assume that he had some unpleasant experience (as we all have had) with some weirdos calling themselves "Christians," and that experience has closed his heart and mind to the truth (for now anyway). I take any commentary of his appropriately; with a grain of salt...

I'm there for the headlines and the links anyhow - not his commentary. And sadly, in this world now there are more people like him than there are people like me.

I was once a lot like him - so I try not to hold it against him. As St.Paul says, "those who are outside (of the Church) God judges." Plus a lot of the stuff on his site is submitted by others there... It's about the news for me - not Mike Rivero.

Anyhow, the other day on his site I saw the following headline: 'Inside Job: Seven Questions about 9/11', and clicking on it brought me to the website of some hippy-looking character named Bob Tuskin. Here's the site and the article in question:

Seven (STUPID) Questions About 9/11

It's written by somebody calling themselves 'Jim Fetzer' (who I have since been mistakenly calling 'Jim Felcher'- Ooops!) and I don't know who he is, but he is obviously either a disinformation agent or a moron - so I really don't even care.

Now when I first read this tripe, my first thought was: "Why was this garbage posted on WRH?" Later, going back I realized that I hadn't noticed that it was tagged 'COVERUPS/DECEPTION/PROPAGANDA'.

They were good tags; accurate tags... they just hadn't been prominent enough. I hope no one else innocently clicked on it and believed any of it without seeing those tags... but I have to think that if I missed the tags, some others probably did as well. If the person who posted it reads this - may I humbly suggest that in cases like that, the headline itself should trumpet the fact that the story is crap so no one is misled.

There are already enough 'No Plane-ers' and 'Mini-NUKE-ers' and proponents of Jew-dy Woods' 'Directed Energy Space Beam Weapon' garbage out there... We don't need to create any more! So let's be clear:

The following article is BUNK!

A Roman Catholic Dared to Speak the Truth! (A Bishop, a Pope, and a Sheeple)

"DENIER" - I wonder what he denies anyway?

by Dr. Ingrid Rimland Zundel

Saturday, July 9th, 2011

It gives me no pleasure to predict that the Federal Republic of Germany is about to soil itself again to please the Noisy Lobby.

The players in the coming spectacle are noteworthy. The story is worth pondering because it has all the earmarks of a wide-screen feature film I hope a savvy producer somewhere is going to pick up. It could be another Scopes Monkey Trial feature right in the heart of Europe.

Imagine an erudite man of the cloth embroiled in a spiritual war against a bullying minority ensconced in a “shitty little country” with branches in New York, London, and Tel Aviv. These bullies are swinging the Auschwitz cudgel in a disgracefully cowed Vaterland in hopes that the current Pope on St. Peter’s Throne will remain in the thralls of a soul-deadening myth. The man of the cloth is a British Bishop of a renegade Catholic church called SSPX (Society of St. Pius X) who has dug in his heels and stands firm.

I am sketching the backdrop for you as it was told to me.

Story of the Rothschilds--The Goldsmiths--Part II

By R. D. Bradshaw

1972 - "The Rothschilds" closes at Lunt-Fontanne Theater New York City after 505 performances

Perhaps the most important goldsmith of all time was Mayer Amschel Bauer-Elhanan of Frankfort, Germany in the mid 18^th century.  As had been true for ages with his relatives and associates, Mayer decided to change his name to one which would be more useful in deceiving and cheating the local people of Germany.  Mayer chose Rothschild (meaning a red sign or shield).  Thus, the famous international banking house of the Rothschilds came into being.

With his successful banking/goldsmithing business, Mayer was soon ready to branch out.  As he had five sons, he kept one in Frankfurt and sent the other four to other nations to also establish international banks--in London, Paris, Vienna and Naples. Son Nathan went to London and son James went to Paris.  Soon, Mayer and his sons gained fame as being experts in international banking and finance.

Early on, they found that war could be a very profitable business for insiders who controlled one or both of the warring factions.  Consequently, history is full of the stories of how the Rothschild banking dynasty financed both sides in war--

A Little Something Regarding Jehovah’s Witnesses

~~~ ~ † ~ ~~~

ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN FIGURES, there are more than three million Jehovah’s Witnesses world-wide, with branch offices in more than 200 countries. They have made extensive inroads in Third World countries, attracting the poverty-stricken and theologically naive with their insistence that "this system of things" (the corrupt and unjust world as it is now) is about to give way to the "New Order" (the millennium). Elsewhere, they have gained converts through their aggressive door-to-door witnessing.

Indeed, a former member of the cult has called it "the most effective way of error today."

Anyone who has had more than a passing encounter with Jehovah’s Witnesses would find it hard to disagree. Their arguments appear so tightly constructed as to be virtually unassailable. Even if one is left unconquered, the experience is frustrating. Is this a no-win situation? It needn’t be. But any hope of launching a successful counter-offensive and rescuing the Jehovah’s Witness from his captivity to error lies in a basic understanding of the cult’s tactics and its fundamental beliefs.

Were the United States, Civilized Society Founded on 'The Seven NoahideLaws'?

According to U.S. Public Law,  102-104 they were.

The text reads:

H.J.Res.104

One Hundred Second Congress of the United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-one

Joint Resolution

To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'.

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

'Protocols of Zion' - 2005 "Documentary" About the Strange Rise ofAntisemitism After 9/11

According to IMDB:

'Protocols of Zion' is...

"A documentary about the rise of antisemitism in the USA after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001."

Antisemitism increased after 9/11? Well, that is strange!

I wonder how in the world these things could be connected? If Arab Muslims perpetrated the attacks on 9/11... why is 'antisemitism' (defined by the Jews as an irrational and baseless hatred of Jews) increasing?

"A documentary" with 'all-star' appearances by:

• Kofi Annan - United Nations (archive footage)
• Father Coughlin - Roman Catholic (archive footage)
• Eric Daniels - Prisoner
• Mehdi Eliefifi - Interfaith Activist
• Abraham Foxman - Anti-Defamation League
• Mel Gibson - 'Antisemite' (archive footage)
• Alan Levin - Director's father and 'Holocaust Survivor™'
• Marc Levin - Director, Illusionist
• 'Pastor' John MacArthur - Grace "Church", one of the good (Noahide) "Christians", shows us how wrong the real Christians have been for 2,000 years
• Heidi Markenson - 9 / 11 Widow, husband was Jewish, you are to believe that this proves conclusively that "Jews did 9/11" is wrong
• Mahathir Mohamad - Malaysia's former Prime Minister (archive footage)
• Daniel Pearl - Jewish journalist, supposedly beheaded by Muslims, Levin shows portions of the beheading video, again somehow supposedly proving conclusively that "Jews did 9/11" is wrong (archive footage)
• George Lincoln Rockwell - Founder of the 'American Nazi Party' in 1959 (archive footage)
• Shaun Walker - National Alliance, White Nationalist, seller of WWII era German National Socialist memorabilia.
• Elie Wiesel - Weasel, liar, 'Holocaust Survivor™' (archive footage)

...

Anyway, the other day I was looking for something RE: 9/11 and I stumbled upon this gem. I'm sure most have seen this already... but it was new to me so I'm going to pick at it a bit. Levin did not do as good of a job "debunking" anything as he thinks (or wants us to think) he did.

Here's the page I found it on (Needless to say 'Missing Links' is not found on this large list of 9/11 videos):

http://www.911docs.net/

Anyone who can honestly take a good look look at the events of 9/11 and not come away with the conviction that it was the 'Jewish state', dual-citizen 'Jewish' traitors and a few of their paid Goyish stooge American politicians that did it... must be suspect - if not for outright deception then certainly for a lack of intelligence.

As for the above page... I am very doubtful that the purveyors of the site could have compiled all of those videos without stumbling upon the glaring evidence of 'Jewish' involvement in all of this. It's possible I suppose (if one only listened to Alex Jones or his ilk) but not likely. This is in my opinion intellectual dishonesty at its finest. Why exclude direct evidence?

Anyway... Levin's 'documentary' (an exceedingly lame attempt at damage control) begins with a Black man on the street in New York (who - for all we know Levin could have chucked a C-note) saying:

"All of this stuff that happened here in America - THE JEWS! Here's my point...

Who's Yehudi?

From Wikipedia:

The catchphrase "Who's Yehoodi?" (or, alternatively, "Who's Yehudi?") originated when violinist Yehudi Menuhin was a guest on the popular radio program of Bob Hope, where sidekick Jerry Colonna, apparently finding the name itself humorous, repeatedly asked "Who's Yehudi?"

Colonna continued the gag on later shows even though Menuhin himself was not a guest, turning "Yehudi" into a widely understood late 1930s slang reference for a mysteriously absent person. 

The United States Navy chose the name "Project Yehudi" for an early 1940s precursor to stealth technology.

[caption id="attachment_1258" align="aligncenter" width="323" caption=""I'm Yehudi!""][/caption]

A song with the title and catchphrase "Who's Yehoodi?" was written in 1940 by Bill Seckler and Matt Dennis. It was covered by Kay Kyser and more famously by Cab Calloway. The final stanza of the song is:

The little man who wasn’t there
Said he heard him on the air
No one seems to know from where
But who's Yehoodi?

Both the catchphrase and the song eventually lost all of their original connection with Menuhin. Its double meaning of "Who Is Jewish?" — the word "Yehudi" means "Jew" in the Hebrew language — was emphasized in a short sound film ("soundie") of the song with variant lyrics made in 1943 with singer Lane Truesdale and the Kingsmen, a male trio, in which a "living portrait" of a pejoratively stereotypical Jew with black hat and long beard leers inappropriately at Truesdale's swinging hips before finally announcing "I'm Yehoodi!"

The national swing dance/lindy hop community website Yehoodi derives its name from this catchphrase, as popularized by the Cab Calloway version of the song.

~~~ ~ † ~ ~~~

Wikipedia...

Sneaky they are...

They only list the very last part of the lyrics of the song in Calloway's version... and they make it sound like the song had nothing to do with Jews until Lane Truesdale and the Kingsmen modified it for use in their soundie (shown below in the comments).

But the complete original lyrics went like this:

An Orthodox Perspective on Christian Zionism

By Father Daniel Swires

---

In the Name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.

There is an ancient belief among some people known as “millenarianism” or “chiliasm.” This is the belief that Christ will set up an earthly kingdom and will rule it for a thousand years, usually referred to as the “Millenium.”

This belief actually has its origin in post-exilic Judaism. An anticipation that survived the Babylonian exile was that one day God would restore the kingdom of David under a model anointed king, the Messiah. Even though idealized, this would be an earthly, historical kingdom, and most often its relation to the end-time was not specified.

Another expectation that developed, especially in apocalyptic writings, was that God would directly intervene in the end-time, without any mention of a restoration of the Davidic kingdom.

One way of combining the two expectations was to see two divine interventions: (1) a restoration of an earthly kingdom or period of blissful prosperity to be followed by (2) God’s end-time victory and judgment. Many writers speculated about these two events. They are found in 1^st Enoch, in 4^th Ezra, in 2^nd Baruch, in the Ascension of Isaiah. It is interesting, though, that each of these writers sees a different time frame for these events. It is quite probable, in fact, that most of them never intended to convey exact times. Rather, they were symbolic ways of predicting divine victory over evil forces that are an obstacle to God’s Kingdom or rule.

St. John, then, in writing the Apocalypse, also used the idea of a thousand-year reign of Christ, not to describe a historical, earthly kingdom, but as a way of saying that ultimately, in His own time, God will have the victory. (It is worth reminding ourselves that only one passage in the Apocalypse, consisting of two verses, mentions a thousand-year reign: from this one small passage has come a lot of exaggerated speculation.)

Here We Go Again: 'The Smurfs Are Racist, Antisemites'!

Look! Under that rock! It's... Antisemitism!!

From: Huffpost Entertainment

Smurf Village or Hitler's Berlin? Same thing, posits one new book.

French sociologist and author Antoine Buéno asserts in "Le Petit Livre Bleu," or, "The Little Blue Book," that the seemingly friendly little blue creatures living a mostly idyllic existence are actually packed with racial propaganda and are, "the embodiment of a totalitarian utopia, steeped in Stalinism and Nazism".

The comics, created by Belgian artist Peyo, were first introduced in a Belgian newspaper in 1958; by 1960, they had their own comic strip, and it was off to the races. The animated series, produced by Hanna Barbera, was launched in 1981.



As relayed by Todaysxm.com, Buéno says that Papa Smurf, the leader of the village, is an authoritarian figure, and that their lack of private property and collective-style economy is a clear nod to socialism.

Meanwhile, their enemy seems Jewish: